[occi-wg] OCCI Monitoring API

Andy Edmonds andrew.edmonds at zhaw.ch
Thu Feb 7 12:10:50 EST 2013 

Thanks alot for this Augusto!

Andy

On 6 February 2013 10:48, Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> the document is now in the official OGF repository. A direct link is the
> following:
>
>
> https://redmine.ogf.org/projects/occi-wg/repository/revisions/monitoring/raw/monitoring/OCCI_monitoring.pdf
>
> According with Ralf suggestion I have created a new branch, to avoid
> spurious dependencies among documents. The new branch is named
> "monitoring", and you have to select this in the "branch" menu on top of
> the "Repository" page on the web site, if you prefer this way to access to
> the document. The source, as well as the pdf, are in the "monitoring"
> directory.
>
> On Monday morning I have unintentionally submitted the draft to the
> Standard Council directly. Sorry for this, I simply found an attractive
> "edit issue" button, and I went straight on this: I thought this was a
> preliminary step... As I understand the document has been put in an idle
> state, waiting for further discussion inside this WG, and by a final
> decision of the chairs of the WG. It is still in open discussion in the WG.
>
> One relevant point that should be clarified is the classification of the
> document: the draft that I have sent you indicates a "community practice".
> From gfd152 I see that it corresponds to "it is intended to represent broad
> consensus across the OGF community" (of course, after approval): this is
> the reason why I selected this track. The alternative is the
> Informational/Experimental document, also suggested by Greg Newby, that
> "may originate from outside the OGF, or they may originate from individuals
> or a group within the OGF", which is the place to start a "Requirement"
> document. It is a relevant decision to take, since it determines the future
> evolution of the document.
>
> Regards,
>
> Augusto
>
>
> 2013/2/4 Ralf Nyren <ralf at nyren.net>
>
>> Please push to a separate branch, e.g.:
>>
>> $ git push origin HEAD:sla-monitoring
>>
>> regards, Ralf
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:06:37 +0100, Andy Edmonds <andrew.edmonds at zhaw.ch>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Augusto - can you place the source document in the git repo? (say
>> > here:
>> >
>>
>> https://redmine.ogf.org/projects/occi-wg/repository/revisions/master/show/sla_andd_monitoring
>> > ).
>> >
>> > Andy
>> >
>> > On 4 February 2013 17:39, Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I have finally submitted the first revision of the monitoring paper.
>> Very
>> >> similar to the one I sent you in january, now formatted according with
>> >> OGF
>> >> styles. You find it in attachment.
>> >>
>> >> Augusto
>> >>
>> >>  2013/1/15 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>
>> >>
>> >>> Let me remind you that what I'm submitting you is the very first
>> >>> official
>> >>> release of the document. It is implicit that it *will* be modified in
>> >>> the
>> >>> future, to take into account any sort of input. The relevant thing now
>> >>> is
>> >>> to establish that we are seriously engaging in the production of this
>> >>> document, and that we have an idea of its coverage and impact.
>> >>>
>> >>> In conclusion, I wouldn't delay the check-in for the reason that we
>> want
>> >>> to synchronize with the work of another group: I think that the
>> informal
>> >>> deadline in the first days of February should be maintained, but
>> before
>> >>> that date we can still do whatever we want with that paper.
>> >>>
>> >>> Augusto
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2013/1/15 Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>>>  Well both are going on and related.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 1/14/2013 9:53 AM, Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Gary,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> do you mean the "NIST RATAX metrics / sla meeting"?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Augusto
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2013/1/14 Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>  Hi Augusto,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The NIST SAJACC group is meeting in DC this week. The results from
>> >>>>> that
>> >>>>> meeting may affect the specification. If you can wait another 2
>> weeks
>> >>>>> to
>> >>>>> see if there is any impact to your specification, it would be
>> >>>>> appreciated.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> b/r
>> >>>>> gary mazzaferro
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 1/14/2013 8:08 AM, Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  Dear all,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> the OCCI-monitoring document
>> (https://www.writelatex.com/26835vgbcrc)
>> >>>>> is in public review since mid-december, and untouched. So I think
>> >>>>> it's time
>> >>>>> to freeze it (following Alan suggestion) as an intermediate revision
>> >>>>> of a
>> >>>>> future document. I'd like to open a discussion about it, so that it
>> >>>>> can be
>> >>>>> checked-in during the first days of February.
>> >>>>> Topics are:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -) Type of document we aim to (white paper, recommendation,
>> >>>>> specification), of which this one will be an initial revision;
>> >>>>> -) Formatting (standard, free);
>> >>>>> -) Authors
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I wait for your valuable opinions...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thank you for your attention
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Augusto
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2012/12/19 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Dear all,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> following the extremely fruitful meeting in Zurich, here is the
>> >>>>>> revision of the proposed document. A few anticipations about the
>> >>>>>> content:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>    - the concepts are always the same: abstraction from short-lived
>> >>>>>>    details using mixins, extract/aggregate/publish pipe for the
>> >>>>>>    measurements
>> >>>>>>    - the syntax is different: I tried to make it simpler and more
>> >>>>>>    powerful: only 2 kinds in the model (one resource and one link),
>> >>>>>>    but the
>> >>>>>>    monitoring infrastructure may be hierarchical from 0 to n levels
>> >>>>>>    - a section about conformance levels has been added: the
>> >>>>>>    monitoring API is optional, so we need to define a level 0 to
>> >>>>>>    avoid
>> >>>>>>    confusion. The other two levels corresponds to the capability of
>> >>>>>>    creating
>> >>>>>>    user mixins (level 2) or not (level 1)
>> >>>>>>    - there is a detailed example of a simple case using an HTTP
>> >>>>>>    rendering
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You can directly interact with the LaTeX document if you like,
>> though
>> >>>>>> the pdf is attached as well.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The LaTeX document is available on a specific collaboration
>> platform:
>> >>>>>> www.writeLatex.com. It is possible to update the document, but I
>> ask
>> >>>>>> you to follow these simple instruction, to avoid to lose the
>> control
>> >>>>>> of the
>> >>>>>> document. If you want to add a note, please use the \rem command,
>> >>>>>> whose
>> >>>>>> usage is described by the following example:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> \rem{Augusto Ciuffoletti}{My comment goes here}
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> placed near the sentence you want to comment. A footnote will be
>> >>>>>> generated ("My comment goes here"), signed with your id ("Augusto
>> >>>>>> Ciuffoletti").
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You can access the document here
>> >>>>>> https://www.writelatex.com/26835vgbcrc without authentication
>> needed.
>> >>>>>> The browser window is divided into two parts: on one side you can
>> >>>>>> edit the
>> >>>>>> source, on the other you see the updated document view. You can
>> also
>> >>>>>> download the pdf or a zip of the current state of the document.
>> >>>>>> There is no
>> >>>>>> "revision history", so it is impossible to "undo" a change.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Augusto
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> >>>>>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> >>>>>> Università di Pisa
>> >>>>>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> >>>>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> >>>>> Università di Pisa
>> >>>>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>   _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> occi-wg mailing
>> >>>>> listocci-wg at ogf.orghttps://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> occi-wg mailing list
>> >>>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> >>>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> >>>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> >>>> Università di Pisa
>> >>>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> occi-wg mailing list
>> >>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> >>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> >>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> >>> Università di Pisa
>> >>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> >> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> >> Università di Pisa
>> >> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> occi-wg mailing list
>> >> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> >> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20130207/08bc8456/attachment.html>

More information about the occi-wg mailing list