[occi-wg] OCCI Monitoring API

[Augusto Ciuffoletti]

Hi all,

I have finally submitted the first revision of the monitoring paper. Very
similar to the one I sent you in january, now formatted according with OGF
styles. You find it in attachment.

Augusto

 2013/1/15 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>

> Let me remind you that what I'm submitting you is the very first official
> release of the document. It is implicit that it *will* be modified in the
> future, to take into account any sort of input. The relevant thing now is
> to establish that we are seriously engaging in the production of this
> document, and that we have an idea of its coverage and impact.
>
> In conclusion, I wouldn't delay the check-in for the reason that we want
> to synchronize with the work of another group: I think that the informal
> deadline in the first days of February should be maintained, but before
> that date we can still do whatever we want with that paper.
>
> Augusto
>
>
> 2013/1/15 Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
>
>>  Well both are going on and related.
>>
>> On 1/14/2013 9:53 AM, Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:
>>
>> Gary,
>>
>> do you mean the "NIST RATAX metrics / sla meeting"?
>>
>> Augusto
>>
>> 2013/1/14 Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
>>
>>>  Hi Augusto,
>>>
>>> The NIST SAJACC group is meeting in DC this week. The results from that
>>> meeting may affect the specification. If you can wait another 2 weeks to
>>> see if there is any impact to your specification, it would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> b/r
>>> gary mazzaferro
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/14/2013 8:08 AM, Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:
>>>
>>>  Dear all,
>>>
>>> the OCCI-monitoring document (https://www.writelatex.com/26835vgbcrc)
>>> is in public review since mid-december, and untouched. So I think it's time
>>> to freeze it (following Alan suggestion) as an intermediate revision of a
>>> future document. I'd like to open a discussion about it, so that it can be
>>> checked-in during the first days of February.
>>> Topics are:
>>>
>>> -) Type of document we aim to (white paper, recommendation,
>>> specification), of which this one will be an initial revision;
>>> -) Formatting (standard, free);
>>> -) Authors
>>>
>>> I wait for your valuable opinions...
>>>
>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>
>>> Augusto
>>>
>>> 2012/12/19 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> following the extremely fruitful meeting in Zurich, here is the
>>>> revision of the proposed document. A few anticipations about the content:
>>>>
>>>>    - the concepts are always the same: abstraction from short-lived
>>>>    details using mixins, extract/aggregate/publish pipe for the measurements
>>>>    - the syntax is different: I tried to make it simpler and more
>>>>    powerful: only 2 kinds in the model (one resource and one link), but the
>>>>    monitoring infrastructure may be hierarchical from 0 to n levels
>>>>    - a section about conformance levels has been added: the monitoring
>>>>    API is optional, so we need to define a level 0 to avoid confusion. The
>>>>    other two levels corresponds to the capability of creating user mixins
>>>>    (level 2) or not (level 1)
>>>>    - there is a detailed example of a simple case using an HTTP
>>>>    rendering
>>>>
>>>> You can directly interact with the LaTeX document if you like, though
>>>> the pdf is attached as well.
>>>>
>>>> The LaTeX document is available on a specific collaboration platform:
>>>> www.writeLatex.com. It is possible to update the document, but I ask
>>>> you to follow these simple instruction, to avoid to lose the control of the
>>>> document. If you want to add a note, please use the \rem command, whose
>>>> usage is described by the following example:
>>>>
>>>> \rem{Augusto Ciuffoletti}{My comment goes here}
>>>>
>>>> placed near the sentence you want to comment. A footnote will be
>>>> generated ("My comment goes here"), signed with your id ("Augusto
>>>> Ciuffoletti").
>>>>
>>>> You can access the document here https://www.writelatex.com/26835vgbcrcwithout authentication needed. The browser window is divided into two
>>>> parts: on one side you can edit the source, on the other you see the
>>>> updated document view. You can also download the pdf or a zip of the
>>>> current state of the document. There is no "revision history", so it is
>>>> impossible to "undo" a change.
>>>>
>>>> Augusto
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>>>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>>>> Università di Pisa
>>>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>>> Università di Pisa
>>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>>>
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>> occi-wg mailing listocci-wg at ogf.orghttps://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> occi-wg mailing list
>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> Università di Pisa
>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> occi-wg mailing list
>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>



-- 
Augusto Ciuffoletti
Dipartimento di Informatica
Università di Pisa
56100 - Pisa (Italy)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20130204/e1e72ca9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OCCI_monitoring.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 318660 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20130204/e1e72ca9/attachment-0001.pdf>