[occi-wg] OCCI testing tutorial and q on use with secured services

Mon Jan 10 09:53:44 CST 2011

Quite a suitable workshop would be WS-REST [1]. Submission is however a
little short: 31st Jan. I'd also second Alex's suggestion on blogs etc. I
would add that we can publish any suitable blog post (max. 500 words) from
community members on their work with OCCI. 

Andy

[1] http://ws-rest.org/2011/cfp

-----Original Message-----
From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:51 PM
To: alan.sill at ttu.edu
Cc: occi-wg at ogf.org
Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI testing tutorial and q on use with secured
services

Alan,

Am 04.01.2011 um 18:37 schrieb Alan Siel:

> That goed beyond the testing topic mentioned above, however, which
probably be separated from this as a topic.  For that, I think the time is
right to put an article or two out into the literature for pedagogical
value.  Any ideas?

For the traditional journals such as the IEEE Transactions (TPDS or so),
what we have is probably to meager. Something "less-scientific" would be
great, but I don't really have anything to offer which is somewhat easily
reachable (CACM and Computer are surely too hard, maybe ACMq). It might also
be possible to reach towards some kind of Software Engineering / Design
thing, but these are usually also very scientific (i.e. having strict
requirements regarding contribution and merit to the state-of-the-art). On
the other hand, the audience is not quite what we want.

Some popular news site or blog would be an option, too, if someone would
"organize" an invitation.

Best,
Alexander 

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alan
> 
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Thijs Metsch wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Is that similar to what Andre Merzky did with SAGA for last OGF? Since
OCCI can also be used for job submission we can demo that demo with OCCI
soon as well - but that's another topic :-)
>> 
>> Is there a link/documentation for the HPC profile stuff?
>> 
>> Attached is a Screenshot of what I guess Alan had in mind - will share
the code soon.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -Thijs
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Wallom [mailto:david.wallom at oerc.ox.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Tue 04/01/2011 15:38
>> To: Thijs Metsch; alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de; alan.sill at ttu.edu
>> Cc: occi-wg at ogf.org
>> Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI testing tutorial and q on use with secured
services
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Another thing that should be considered is to replicate what has been
done
>> with the HPC Basic Profile Interoperability demonstration that has
>> successfully run at a number of OGF and other meetings. That uses all
>> known implementations  and is a good example that OGF management and
>> community can use to show 'success'.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> David
>> --
>> ===================================
>> Dr David Wallom
>> Oxford e-Research Centre
>> University of Oxford
>> Rm 160, 7 Keble Road
>> Oxford
>> OX1 3QG
>> 
>> +44(0)1865 610601
>> ===================================
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/01/2011 09:40, "Thijs Metsch" <tmetsch at platform.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Indeed a good idea - will try to create such a thingy soon.
>>> 
>>> BTW. I have tested using my implementation with SSL activated. Had it
>>> running with GSI-Authz also a while back. Currently I do not support
>>> that anymore (I changed the framework in the background). But at least I
>>> can verify that it can be done :-)
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> -Thijs
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:25 AM
>>>> To: alan.sill at ttu.edu
>>>> Cc: occi-wg at ogf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI testing tutorial and q on use with secured
>>>> services
>>>> 
>>>> A very good idea, Alan.
>>>> 
>>>> It would be great if we could provide an automated test suite running
>>>> somewhere "in the cloud" (GAE maybe?) which people can use to verify
>>>> their OCCI implementations. Any opinions on this?
>>>> 
>>>> -Alexander
>>>> 
>>>> Am 20.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Alan Sill:
>>>> 
>>>>> How about an OCCI testing tutorial using some of the deployed
>>>> instances as an example?  A starting point might be the tool at the
>>>> following link.  (Version 2.3.3 released today.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Project:
>>>>> rest-client - Project Hosting on Google Code
>>>>> 
>>>>> Link:
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/rest-client/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd also like to see a test with SSL-secured httpd services,
>>>> preferably in a GSI AuthZ or other user cert-secured context.  I know
>>>> this will be trivial but I'd just like to see if anyone has done it in
>>>> a deployed context to date.  Any links?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>> 
>>>>> P.S.: Please ignore the auto-reply message - I'm reading messages on
>>>> this topic this holiday...
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> occi-wg mailing list
>>>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> occi-wg mailing list
>>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> occi-wg mailing list
>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <screeny.png>
> 

_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg at ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20110110/b3298263/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Ireland Limited (Branch)
Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland
Registered Number: E902934

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.