[occi-wg] OCCI Core ready for public comment version

Tue Nov 9 02:34:04 CST 2010

Autobot or Decepticon?

I like the new structure, and also the naming, btw...

-Alexander

Am 09.11.2010 um 08:25 schrieb Alexis Richardson:

> It also looks remarkably like a Transformer...
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Michael Behrens <michael.behrens at r2ad.com> wrote:
> The diagram looks good & reads well to me.
> Thanks.
> 
> Ralf Nyren wrote:
>> Michael, 
>> 
>> Please find attached a version of the core model with Kind split into two separate classes. Was it something like this you were looking for?   
>> 
>> To me it makes sense to do the split. Before we had the abstraction between Category and Kind it was tempting to stuff all functionality into the Category. I do not think it is anymore. 
>> 
>> I think this, exactly as you say Michael, definitely help clear things up a bit :) 
>> 
>> If there are any objections I need them asap, if this is going in I need to start updating the core doc tomorrow. And if anyone has a better name than "Mixin" please speak up! 
>> 
>> regards, Ralf 
>> 
>> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:35:34 +0100, Michael Behrens <michael.behrens at r2ad.com> wrote: 
>> 
>>> I see that the core UML model has been updated, interesting changes. The name 
>>> changes look okay to me (Entity, Kind). 
>>> 
>>> 2-cents: Structural and Non-Structural concept might be confusing to folks 
>>> reading it the first time through. Perhaps its purpose (extensibility) could be 
>>> stated before their definitions in a non normative manner. Lastly, would adding 
>>> two subclass of kind (structured/unstructured) help clear things a bit? (The 
>>> text seems to speak as if there are two subclasses). 
>>> 
>> 
>> core_model.png
>> 
>> <ATT00001..png>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Behrens
> R2AD, LLC
> (571) 594-3008 (cell)
> (703) 714-0442 (land)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> 
> 
> <ATT00002..txt>