[occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
Gary Mazz
garymazzaferro at gmail.com
Mon May 17 09:01:59 CDT 2010
Hi Gyula,
The XML versions of OCCI were developed prior to the XHTML5/RDFa
discussions. I believe Andy's version was for the SLA at SOI project which
uses XML. My version is being used as a staged prototype to help move
toward the RDFa implementation. Since XHTML5/RDFa is a format similar
enough to POX, the transition to and future adoption should be no more
difficult than adopting pox.
I hope this explains why there are XML formats floating around. I can't
speak for the SLA at SOI project, but as soon as the XHTML5/RDFa is
completed, I will be abandoning my XML implementation.
cheers,
gary
Sam Johnston wrote:
> 2010/5/17 Csom Gyula <csom at interface.hu <mailto:csom at interface.hu>>
>
> Hi,
> when rereading your reply one more question came up. You wrote:
>
> > Andy (Edmonds) and Gary (Mazzaferro) are working on this
> > topic. Especially with an eye on RDFa and XHTML5
>
> Does that mean there won't be pure XML format, XSD scheme?
> I'm asking this because both Andy and Gary posted XSD schemes
> to the mailing list. I'm a bit confused... Could you please
> clarify this?
>
>
> That's right, there are no plans for a POX (plain old XML) rendering
> at this time.
>
> Sam
>
> -----Eredeti üzenet-----
> Feladó: Thijs Metsch [mailto:tmetsch at platform.com
> <mailto:tmetsch at platform.com>]
> Küldve: 2010. 05. 15., Szo 12:56
> Címzett: Csom Gyula; occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> Tárgy: RE: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> That makes life easier :-) As you know we are working on the
> rendering topic and you suggestions are more than welcome!
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Thijs
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
> [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org>] On
> > Behalf Of Csom Gyula
> > Sent: Samstag, 15. Mai 2010 12:51
> > To: occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
> >
> > Hi,
> > thx for your reply!
> >
> > I forgot to mention in my previous mail, that our development
> would end
> > at the end of this summer (when the deployment phase would start).
> > Though we do not have a detailed plan, yet, I guess cluster specific
> > development wouldn't start before july, so we have at least 1-1,5
> > month before (detailed) design decisions must be made...
> >
> > Let me add one more thing regarding the upcoming scheme. In order to
> > be extensible it would be nice to support any or anyAttribute
> element
> > within the scheme. At least for the Category element this could be
> > necessary for compatibility reasons, eg. according to the http
> category
> > header draft, category already supports extensions
> > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-http-category-header-00,
> > Section 3).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gyula
> >
> > -----Eredeti üzenet-----
> > Feladó: Thijs Metsch [mailto:tmetsch at platform.com
> <mailto:tmetsch at platform.com>]
> > Küldve: 2010. 05. 15., Szo 12:18
> > Címzett: Csom Gyula; occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> > Másolatot kap: Andy Edmonds; garymazzaferro at gmail.com
> <mailto:garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
> > Tárgy: RE: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Right now Andy (Edmonds) and Gary (Mazzaferro) are working on this
> > topic. Especially with an eye on RDFa and XHTML5. I doubt that there
> > will be something ready within the next 2 weeks, since both are
> pretty
> > busy right now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -Thijs
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
> [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org>] On
> > > Behalf Of Csom Gyula
> > > Sent: Samstag, 15. Mai 2010 11:17
> > > To: occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> > > Subject: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > when can we expect the final draft version of the occi xml
> scheme to
> > be
> > > published?
> > >
> > > We are backed by OpenNebula which uses XML as rendering format.
> > > Meanwhile we have
> > > to extend it's capabilities in order to support clusters (see my
> > > previus mail:
> > > "Cluster kind or such", where I was adviced to use
> Categories). Since
> > > we want to adhere
> > > to the standard it's important for us to know whether your xml
> spec
> > > time is within our
> > > development timeframe or not:)
> > >
> > > I've seen Gary Mazzaferro already posted the first draft
> version of
> > the
> > > occi xml scheme
> > > at March
> > (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/2010-March/001682.html).
> > > I have one
> > > question in this regard. Do you plan to support links and
> categories
> > in
> > > the scheme?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gyula
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > occi-wg mailing list
> > > occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> > > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > occi-wg mailing list
> > occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg at ogf.org>
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
More information about the occi-wg
mailing list