[occi-wg] OCCI Editor Getting Started Guide (docs/README.txt)
Christopher Smith
csmith at platform.com
Mon Mar 29 13:42:05 CDT 2010
I¹m all in favour of a well reviewed spec. Just wanted to make sure this was
understood.
Thanks,
-- Chris
On 29/3/10 11:34 , "Sam Johnston" <samj at samj.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Christopher Smith <csmith at platform.com>
> wrote:
>> Just as a procedural aside from copyright/license issues....
>>
>> If you have very substantive changes to the document that has been through
>> public comment already, do you realize another 60 day comment period might be
>> necessary (i.e. if the changes aren¹t just for addressing the current set of
>> public comments)?
>
> Yes, so be it. At least this time round we will have a feature complete draft
> so subsequent changes should be cosmetic (which is to say people can fairly
> safely start implementing). From an openness point of view it's hard to
> criticise having not one but TWO rounds of public comments :)
>
> Sam
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20100329/e2a72546/attachment.html
More information about the occi-wg
mailing list