[occi-wg] OCCI Editor Getting Started Guide (docs/README.txt)

[Sam Johnston]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:

>
> Basically, all OGF is asking for right now is, that instead of
> forking, a new name or version number is applied to a specification,
> so that a specific OGF recommendation can still carry that interop
> promise.
>

A trademark will do a better job of doing that than copyrights ever would
have anyway.

@Gary: A standard is described by a specification - indeed one standard
could be described by many specifications (for example, one official
specification and one reverse engineered from a compliant implementation).
Ideally you want your standard to be well described in specifications
(supported by test suites, interop bake-offs, etc.) such that the
implementations are interoperable.

Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20100329/52affd23/attachment.html