[occi-wg] Voting result

[Andre Merzky]

Quoting [Alexis Richardson] (May 09 2009):
> 
> > I see three conclusions going forward:
> >
> > 1) Continue our specification in terms of the model (nouns, verbs,
> > attributes, semantics of these, how these are linked together) with both
> > JSON and XML renderings of this being explored on the wiki. We can decide
> > later if we run with both or just JSON.
> 
> I think it is essential that a JSON rendering is produced, treating it
> as a primary format for interop on the wire.  This is the case,
> regardless of any other aspects of this discussion.
> 
> One good reason is: Those of us proposing JSON as a primary format
> cannot expect a fair hearing from the XML-preferring folks unless this
> rendering is concrete, visible and examinable in its specifics.

Well, to be fair: the XML folx could say the same ;-)

Andre



-- 
Nothing is ever easy.