[occi-wg] Syntax for attributes on links

Sam Johnston samj at samj.net
Wed May 6 11:59:36 CDT 2009


+1

FWIW everything so far is flat... and I see no reason to change that.

Sam

On 5/6/09, Alexis Richardson <alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good.
>
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Richard Davies
> <richard.davies at elastichosts.com> wrote:
>>> We had a chat about the formats thing and realised that a good
>>> position might be to disallow any XML use that cannot easily be
>>> expressed in JSON.
>>
>> Yes, I agree strongly with that.
>>
>>> This would allow JSON to be used - good news for "being very simple and
>>> clear"
>>
>> Yes, and we'll be fighting for the "simple and clear" JSON to have the
>> minimum depth of nested data structures wherever it seems to be getting
>> too
>> complex.
>>
>> I also think that simple and clear JSON is also easy to convert to TXT, so
>> this will give us all three formats easily, and with automatic
>> conversions,
>> which is where we should be.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>



More information about the occi-wg mailing list