[occi-wg] What next on the apis ?

[Gary Mazz]

Thanks...

Ancillary: 0
Computer : 2
Storage  : 0
==============
Total    : 1

Kristoffer Sheather wrote:
> +1 compute then storage.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro at gmail.com>
> *Sent*: Thursday, 11 June 2009 7:04 AM
> *To*: "Krishna Sankar (ksankar)" <ksankar at cisco.com>
> *Subject*: Re: [occi-wg] What next on the apis ?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Ancillary: 0
> Computer : 1
> Storage : 0
> ==============
> Total : 1
>
>
>
> Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
> > IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage.
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > |-----Original Message-----
> > |From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
> > Behalf
> > |Of Gary Mazz
> > |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM
> > |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg at ogf.org
> > |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ?
> > |
> > |Hi
> > |
> > |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities
> > |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next
> > |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ?
> > |
> > |-gary
> > |_______________________________________________
> > |occi-wg mailing list
> > |occi-wg at ogf.org
> > |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>