[occi-wg] Anymore use cases which nede to be documented

[Marcus Hardt]

I don't quite understand what the wiki involvement is, but now it worked ;-)

M.

Quoting Thijs Metsch
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Can you try again for some reasons many people on the wiki have not been
> assigned the right roles/permissions. Might be an issue that 4 people
> approved membership with a outdated interface *g*
>
> -Thijs
>
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:31 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > Quoting Thijs Metsch
> >
> > > Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be
> > > able to commit...
> >
> > Well, yes I know; I'm a member of the project. The "svn co" command
> > given worked, but this commit failed:
> >
> > [marcus at tuna:~/svn/occi/docs]$ svn ci --username marcus -m "Added
> > Mutliple Allocation use-case"
> > svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> > svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> > MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/repos/occi/!svn/act/9c1b5eea-2bbd-412d-
> > b19e-6b7e2ac80bf5'
> >
> >
> > I reproduced this, by check out into a different dir, using
> > 	svn checkout --username marcus http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi
> > and committing again, using the above command (with and without
> > --username marcus).
> >
> > What to do?
> >
> > M.
> >
> > > -Thijs
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > > > Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403:
> > > > Forbidden).
> > > >
> > > > Here's it as a patch.
> > > > Index: occi-usecases.xml
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- occi-usecases.xml   (revision 51)
> > > > +++ occi-usecases.xml   (working copy)
> > > > @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@
> > > >        </listitem>
> > > >      </itemizedlist>
> > > >    </section>
> > > > +  <section>
> > > > +         <title>Multiple Allocation</title>
> > > > +         <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para>
> > > > +
> > > > +          <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead>
> > > > +
> > > > +         <itemizedlist>
> > > > +                 <listitem>
> > > > +                         <para>Definition of groups: There should
> > > > be a way to define groups +                                 of
> > > > computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two +
> > > >       groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> +
> > > >         </listitem>
> > > > +
> > > > +                 <listitem>
> > > > +                         <para>Information: For configuration of
> > > > the members of the defined +                                 groups,
> > > > there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about +
> > > >        all groups and their basic configurations. In the example,
> > > > the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all +         
> > > >                        Workernodes. The workernodes will need to
> > > > know this, as well +
> > > >      _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different +
> > > >                            group. </para>
> > > > +                 </listitem>
> > > > +
> > > > +         </itemizedlist>
> > > > +  </section>
> > > > +
> > > >  </article>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Thijs Metsch
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document
> > > > > yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > -Thijs
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > > > > > I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've
> > > > > > added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if
> > > > > > this is enough.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Quoting Michael Behrens
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support
> > > > > > > the installation of patches.  Let me know if that's okay.
> > > > > > > Attached is a PDF of the content as well.  A main driver was
> > > > > > > to also provide for applying patches and updates to the
> > > > > > > system.  I think it makes some sense to be able to use the
> > > > > > > same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thijs Metsch wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the
> > > > > > > > document:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.
> > > > > > > >occi -wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Except the financial grid use case...)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and
> > > > > > > > references to the sources need to be added - but this is
> > > > > > > > just the start :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need
> > > > > > > > to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please reply until Tuesday next week...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All the best,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Thijs


-- 
M.