[occi-wg] Anymore use cases which nede to be documented

[shlomo.swidler at gmail.com]

Just wondering - is this the same as or different from tagging?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Marcus Hardt <marcus at hardt-it.de> wrote:

> Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
>
> Here's it as a patch.
> Index: occi-usecases.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- occi-usecases.xml   (revision 51)
> +++ occi-usecases.xml   (working copy)
> @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@
>       </listitem>
>     </itemizedlist>
>   </section>
> +  <section>
> +         <title>Multiple Allocation</title>
> +         <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para>
> +
> +          <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead>
> +
> +         <itemizedlist>
> +                 <listitem>
> +                         <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way
> to define groups
> +                                 of computers. In the example of a
> cluster, there would be two
> +                                 groups: The Headnode and a couple of
> Workernodes.</para>
> +                 </listitem>
> +
> +                 <listitem>
> +                         <para>Information: For configuration of the
> members of the defined
> +                                 groups, there should be way (maybe a URL)
> to find out about
> +                                 all groups and their basic
> configurations. In the example, the
> +                                 Headnode would want to know IPs or
> Hostnames of all
> +                                 Workernodes. The workernodes will need to
> know this, as well
> +                                 _and_ they need to know, that the
> headnode is in a different
> +                                 group. </para>
> +                 </listitem>
> +
> +         </itemizedlist>
> +  </section>
> +
>  </article>
>
>
> Quoting Thijs Metsch
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself
> > if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -Thijs
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > > I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it
> > > only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
> > >
> > > M.
> > >
> > > Quoting Michael Behrens
> > >
> > > > I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the
> > > > installation of patches.  Let me know if that's okay.
> > > > Attached is a PDF of the content as well.  A main driver was to also
> > > > provide for applying patches and updates to the system.  I think it
> > > > makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as
> well
> > > > as tasks, etc.
> > > >
> > > > If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Thijs Metsch wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/
> > > > >docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
> > > > >
> > > > > (Except the financial grid use case...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and
> > > > > references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the
> > > > > start :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be
> > > > > added? Any which need to be refined etc?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please reply until Tuesday next week...
> > > > >
> > > > > All the best,
> > > > >
> > > > > -Thijs
>
>
> --
> M.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20090730/ca321098/attachment.html