[Nsi-wg] Issue 109 in ogf-nsi-project: Align STP Label definition closer to similar types within NML.

[ogf-nsi-project at googlecode.com]

Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium FoundInVersion-2.0 FixedInVersion-2.0

New issue 109 by jmacauley: Align STP Label definition closer to similar  
types within NML.
http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=109

The NSI STP definition was originally intended to be a generic attribute  
type/value pair mechanism but morphed into a Label type definition.  At the  
moment it is too complex for the role it is performing.  In addition it is  
not in alignment with the NML definition for LabelType.  These definitions  
need to be normalized.

Also, NML has separate definitions for LabelType (a single label) and  
LabelGroupType (a range of labels).  Both are applicable to the STP  
definition and should be incorporated.

For example, using an STP to specify a SONET service would require the  
specification of a set of timeslots associated with the service on the STP.

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings