[Nsi-wg] Release command

Radek Krzywania radek.krzywania at man.poznan.pl
Thu Feb 28 05:11:43 EST 2013


+1 for remove.
I was never convinced to usefulness of it, and we do not support it in
AutoBAHN.

Best regards
Radek

-----------------------------------------------------------
Radek Krzywania
e-mail: radek.krzywania at man.poznan.pl
phone: +48 61 850 2526

Network R&D

Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Noskowskiego 12/14
61-704 Poznan
Poland


-----Original Message-----
From: nsi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:nsi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
John MacAuley
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 6:39 PM
To: nsi-wg at ogf.org Group
Subject: [Nsi-wg] Release command

Peoples,

I understand the usefulness of having a release command from a networking
perspective, but I know a number of implementations are not supporting it at
the moment (and some have no intention of supporting it).  With my new "lets
make the state machine as simple as possible attitude" I started to wonder
what is the customer use case for this command?  Chin had one where someone
wanted to keep their reservation, but wanted to free up bandwidth for others
to use.  This is an interesting use case, but not the behaviour of the
current command as documented.  Removal of this command can significantly
simplify the protocol and state machine.

Would it be possible for people to provide their customer use cases for this
command?  I am wondering if it is truly needed, or perhaps, we have the
incorrect behaviour defined.

Thank you,
John
_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg



More information about the nsi-wg mailing list