[Nsi-wg] minutes from today's NSI conf call...
Jeroen van der Ham
vdham at uva.nl
Thu Dec 12 02:14:08 EST 2013
Hi,
Sorry, I was confused by this:
> Decision: remove separate Network part from STP.
But this means that the STP is no longer the pair of (STPid, Networkid) ?
Jeroen.
On 11 Dec 2013, at 23:44, John MacAuley <john.macauley at surfnet.nl> wrote:
> There was no change in positioning by the NSI group. The STP Id is still opaque upon resolution of the current discussion.
>
> John
>
> On 2013-12-11, at 4:21 PM, Jeroen van der Ham <vdham at uva.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 19:57, John MacAuley <john.macauley at surfnet.nl> wrote:
>>> 3. The stpId definition was cleaned up ad discussed on the call.
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that the proposal now is to do “urn:ogf:<opaque-id>” identifiers?
>>
>> Jeroen.
>>
>
More information about the nsi-wg
mailing list