[Nsi-wg] minutes from today's NSI conf call...

Jeroen van der Ham vdham at uva.nl
Thu Dec 12 02:14:08 EST 2013


Hi,

Sorry, I was confused by this:

> Decision: remove separate Network part from STP.

But this means that the STP is no longer the pair of (STPid, Networkid) ?

Jeroen.

On 11 Dec 2013, at 23:44, John MacAuley <john.macauley at surfnet.nl> wrote:

> There was no change in positioning by the NSI group.  The STP Id is still opaque upon resolution of the current discussion.
> 
> John
> 
> On 2013-12-11, at 4:21 PM, Jeroen van der Ham <vdham at uva.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 19:57, John MacAuley <john.macauley at surfnet.nl> wrote:
>>> 3. The stpId definition was cleaned up ad discussed on the call.
>> 
>> Do I understand correctly that the proposal now is to do “urn:ogf:<opaque-id>” identifiers?
>> 
>> Jeroen.
>> 
> 



More information about the nsi-wg mailing list