[Nsi-wg] Query types

[John MacAuley]

Agreed.

> I'm going to make a bold claim here: 19 out 20 queries will be for status retrieval. However that is very easy to extract from a query containing all the local information, so I don't really see the value of "give me some of the local information" vs. "give me all the local information". Just give it all, and I can extract what I need.

On 2012-05-18, at 6:02 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen wrote:

> On Wed, 16 May 2012, MacAuley, John (John) wrote:
> 
>> Can I propose we support three Query operation types?  Currently we have two (Summary and Details) or which no one has implemented the recursive Details.  I think we should revise the definition to the following:
> 
> I'm going to make a bold claim here: 19 out 20 queries will be for status retrieval. However that is very easy to extract from a query containing all the local information, so I don't really see the value of "give me some of the local information" vs. "give me all the local information". Just give it all, and I can extract what I need.
> 
> On a side note: I have intended to look at the queryresult types before suggesting this, but haven't gotten around to it: Are the two query result types so different that they couldn't be one? (making the tree optional).
> 
> 
>    Best regards, Henrik
> 
> Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net>
> Software Developer, NORDUnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg