[Nsi-wg] Identifiers

[Aaron Brown]

I concur with Freek.

Cheers,
Aaron

On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:

> Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> 
>> We have a couple of options going forward:
>> 
>> - use identifiers following NML-WG standard
>> 	a) allow domain owners free form in the opaque part
>> 	b) define that opaque part should begin with "stp:"
>> - try to register a different urng:ogf subnamespace
> 
> My personal ideal [*] would be (a), thus NSI saying "here is a list of
> STP" and just giving a list of identifiers, without many syntax
> restrictions.
> 
> (And I would be thrilled if that identifier could be a NML Port, thus
> that a NSI STP is a NML Port, but that is a different discussion.)
> 
> That said, I haven't implemented an NSI interface, so feel free to
> ignore me :)
> 
> Freek
> 
> 
> [*] Well, I have some more ideals, but that's probably out of scope for
> NSI :)
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs
July 15-19, 2012 - Palo Alto, California
Hosted by Stanford University
http://events.internet2.edu/2012/jt-stanford/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20120612/2e361ad8/attachment.html>