[Nsi-wg] updated STP proposal

[Jeroen van der Ham]

Hi,

I'm trying to catch up on the progress since I went on holiday, so please allow me to ask some obvious questions:

- Why has the definition of the local id been changed? The last I heard was that these would be full URNs which could be mapped separately to NML Port identifiers.
- Why has the definition of an STP changed? Last I heard these would be uni-directional to be able to map to NML Ports, and this would also solve the ERO direction ambiguity.

Jeroen.


On 30 Jul 2012, at 18:12, Guy Roberts wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> Please find attached a re-worked proposal for STPs based on input that I have received from Tomohiro Kudoh and Jerry Sobieski last week.
> 
> Guy
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Guy Roberts PhD
> Senior Transport Network Architect
> DANTE
> Cambridge, UK
> +44 1223 371316
> 
> DANTE is the project co-ordinator and operator of GÉANT,
> the high-speed pan-European research and education network that is
> transforming the way researchers collaborate.
> Learn more at: www.geant.net<http://www.geant.net/>
> Like us on: www.facebook.com/GEANTnetwork<http://www.facebook.com/GEANTnetwork>
> Follow us at: www.twitter.com/GEANTnews<http://www.twitter.com/GEANTnews>
> 
> DANTE is the trading name of Delivery of Advanced Network Technology to Europe Limited registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office - 9400 Garsington Road, Oxford Business Park, Oxford OX4 2HN.
> _____________________________________________________________________
> 
> <STPs_summary6.docx><STPs_summary6.pdf>_______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg