[Nsi-wg] Issue 41 in ogf-nsi-project: Do we replace the replyTo field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup?
ogf-nsi-project at googlecode.com
ogf-nsi-project at googlecode.com
Fri Oct 7 00:33:51 CDT 2011
Comment #3 on issue 41 by takahiro... at gmail.com: Do we replace the replyTo
field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup?
http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=41
I want to use the replyTo field.
Currently, all NSA act as requester and provider. In this case, we are able
to look up the csProviderEndpoint of requesters easily.
However, in near future, some NSA act as only a requester, e.g. PerfSONAR
and AutoEarth. It is difficult to describe and manage all requester
endpoints as same as provider ones. Moreover, it causes a high barrier to
publish new requesters.
Therefore, a requester endpoint should be obtained using the replyTo field
in the SOAP message payload.
More information about the nsi-wg
mailing list