[Nsi-wg] Issue 41 in ogf-nsi-project: Do we replace the replyTo field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup?

ogf-nsi-project at googlecode.com ogf-nsi-project at googlecode.com
Fri Oct 7 00:33:51 CDT 2011


Comment #3 on issue 41 by takahiro... at gmail.com: Do we replace the replyTo  
field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup?
http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=41

I want to use the replyTo field.

Currently, all NSA act as requester and provider. In this case, we are able  
to look up the csProviderEndpoint of requesters easily.
However, in near future, some NSA act as only a requester, e.g. PerfSONAR  
and AutoEarth. It is difficult to describe and manage all requester  
endpoints as same as provider ones. Moreover, it causes a high barrier to  
publish new requesters.

Therefore, a requester endpoint should be obtained using the replyTo field  
in the SOAP message payload.



More information about the nsi-wg mailing list