[Nsi-wg] TransactionId

[John MacAuley]

Sorry, I didn't see the comments.  Was looking in the wrong inbox :-)

On 2011-07-19, at 3:22 PM, Jerry Sobieski wrote:

> I would vote for a sequence# assigned by the RA (or initiating NSA in case of a ForceEnd).   This will make debugging easier too I think.
> J
> 
> On 7/19/11 12:26 PM, John MacAuley wrote:
>> Peoples,
>> 
>> This weekend we had a lively discussion on transactionId.  In the end it was agreed that we would continue to support this identifier, however it will be renamed.  I have currently defined it as a uuid for uniqueness as is done in many implementations using a transactionId.
>> 
>> Now Inder asked if we could make it a sequence I'd to help with processing on the RA side.  Comments?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> nsi-wg mailing list
>> nsi-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1791 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110719/0f2e4953/attachment.bin