[Nsi-wg] [NSI imp] NSI Identifier format

[John MacAuley]

When you say "will not be the long term solution for us" do you mean NORDUnet or is it the general NSI us?

John

On 2014-03-03, at 4:29 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, John MacAuley wrote:
> 
>> Would it be possible to make progress on this topic so we could perhaps close in Atlanta?  We have had discussions, and Freek has presented the difference between an identifier and an address, but I believe we need something more concrete.  I have proposed the structured URN approach to address the problem.
>> 
>> Can we please come to agreement soon?
> 
> I still don't see the need for this. It doesn't solve any problems AFAICT. It just introduces more things to adhere to without providing any value.
> 
> Furthermore, I think it is clear that NML - at least in its current incarnation - will not be the long term solution for us. Adding a lot of rules for how to generate identifiers for it just seems like a waste of time.
> 
> 
>    Best regards, Henrik
> 
> Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net>
> Software Developer, NORDUnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg