[Nml-wg] Lifetime

[Roman Łapacz]

W dniu 2013-03-13 15:01, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Time is always a very difficult problem. We have tried very hard to define this properly in the schema. There was one small gap that we missed: when a Network Object did not have a Lifetime *and* no new Topology object with a version attribute was published, or a new one is and does not contain a description of that Network Object.
>
> I've expanded the description in the schema to this, can you please check if this covers all cases and whether you agree with it?
>
>
> If a Network Object has no associated \emph{Lifetime} objects, or the start or end attribute of a Lifetime object is missing,

Presence of start and/or end elements in Lifetime is not optional 
according to the XSD schema.

Roman

>   the default lifetime may be assumed to start on or before the time specified in the version attribute of the most specific Topology object that contains this Network Object. The end of that assumed lifetime is indefinite, until a Topology object with a higher version number is published. This new description can define a new Lifetime for the object, or the Topology. If the new description does not contain the Network Object, the end time is assumed to have passed.
>
>
> Jeroen.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nml-wg mailing list
> nml-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg