[Nml-wg] Abstract for TERENA

[Roman Łapacz]

W dniu 2012-11-21 11:08, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Very good idea. Any particular sections you would like to contribute on?

I could take Requirements and Schema Explanations. Of course I count on 
your improvements after giving you my drafts.

Roman

>
> Jeroen.
>
> On 21 Nov 2012, at 10:54, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would stress the standardisation aspect. I've updated your structure a bit adding the requirements and standardisation sections that I think it would be good to have. Just a proposal to consider.
>>
>> 1. Introduction (general idea, why a standardized topology desc is needed, bit of history, etc.)
>> 2. Requirements (what the NML WG wanted to achieve: abstraction, multi-layer, multi-domain, extensions allowed, independent of the format - XML, RNC, OWL, others, etc.)
>> 3, Schema Explanation (short description of the schema)
>> 4. Standardisation under OGF (status and short description of OGF)
>> 5. A use case of NML - Supporting Network Provisioning (topology in NSI)
>> 4. Future Work (describe briefly plans for the future of NML)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roman
>>
>> W dniu 2012-11-20 15:09, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We've discussed that we would like to prepare an abstract for the TERENA conference next year. The deadline for the extended abstracts (600-1200 words) is November 30th.
>>>
>>> I promised to write a structure for this abstract. I was thinking something like the following:
>>>
>>> Title: The Network Markup Language
>>>
>>> 1. Introdcution
>>> (general idea, bit of history, current status)
>>>
>>> 2. Schema Explanation
>>> (short description of the schema)
>>>
>>> 3. Use-Cases of NML
>>>
>>> 3.1 Supporting Network Monitoring
>>> (Application in PerfSonar?)
>>>
>>> 3.2 Supporting Network Provisioning
>>> (Application in NSI)
>>>
>>> Other use-cases?
>>>
>>> 4. Future Work
>>> (describe briefly plans for the future of NML)
>>>
>>>
>>> Who would like to contribute? What would you like to contribute on? Is there something missing in this structure that you think should be there?
>>>
>>> Jeroen.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nml-wg mailing list
>>> nml-wg at ogf.org
>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg