[Nml-wg] Abstract for TERENA

[Roman Łapacz]

Hi,

I would stress the standardisation aspect. I've updated your structure a 
bit adding the requirements and standardisation sections that I think it 
would be good to have. Just a proposal to consider.

1. Introduction (general idea, why a standardized topology desc is 
needed, bit of history, etc.)
2. Requirements (what the NML WG wanted to achieve: abstraction, 
multi-layer, multi-domain, extensions allowed, independent of the format 
- XML, RNC, OWL, others, etc.)
3, Schema Explanation (short description of the schema)
4. Standardisation under OGF (status and short description of OGF)
5. A use case of NML - Supporting Network Provisioning (topology in NSI)
4. Future Work (describe briefly plans for the future of NML)

Cheers,
Roman

W dniu 2012-11-20 15:09, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
> Hi all,
>
> We've discussed that we would like to prepare an abstract for the TERENA conference next year. The deadline for the extended abstracts (600-1200 words) is November 30th.
>
> I promised to write a structure for this abstract. I was thinking something like the following:
>
> Title: The Network Markup Language
>
> 1. Introdcution
> (general idea, bit of history, current status)
>
> 2. Schema Explanation
> (short description of the schema)
>
> 3. Use-Cases of NML
>
> 3.1 Supporting Network Monitoring
> (Application in PerfSonar?)
>
> 3.2 Supporting Network Provisioning
> (Application in NSI)
>
> Other use-cases?
>
> 4. Future Work
> (describe briefly plans for the future of NML)
>
>
> Who would like to contribute? What would you like to contribute on? Is there something missing in this structure that you think should be there?
>
> Jeroen.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nml-wg mailing list
> nml-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg