[Nml-wg] NML namespace

[Jeroen van der Ham]

On 31 Jul 2012, at 10:48, Freek Dijkstra wrote:

> It seems that either "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml/" or
> "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml#" will do.
> 
> Most namespace pick the hash, do you know why?

No, but I'm guessing it has to do with the "rdf:id" construct, combined with the HTML fragment identifier feeling more natural.

> What is a "hierarchical namespace" and how does it differ from a
> "non-hierarchical namespace"?

I have no idea, I was just reproducing what was in the RDF standard. Frankly, I was surprised it was there.

> (PS: I personally still prefer http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml#
> over http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml#, despite GFD.84. Probably
> because I'm used to it).

Ehm, which one over which?

Jeroen.