[Nml-wg] Simple example #1
Roman Łapacz
romradz at man.poznan.pl
Wed Jul 11 09:50:38 EDT 2012
W dniu 2012-07-11 15:33, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
> On 11-07-2012 15:26, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
>> On 11-07-2012 15:16, Roman Łapacz wrote:
>>> <!-- COMMENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -->
>>> <!-- I propose to use new Relation="representedBy" -->
>>> <!--- when an object (in this case a Link can be represented by an other. Definition of them is the same! -->
>>>
>>> <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
>>> <nml:Relation type"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy">
>>> <nml:Link id="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
>>> <nml:Relation>
>>> </nml:Link>
> Hold on, did you mean to write:
>
>> <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
>> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy">
>> <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
>> <nml:Relation>
>> </nml:Link>
Yes, but I understand that I can use Link instead of BidirectionalLink
while pointing to BidirectionalLink.
in fact I should have used IdRef
<nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
<nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy">
<nml:Link idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx">
<nml:Relation>
Roman
> ?
>
> That would make more sense to me, and is probably the same as the
> "isAlias" relation.
>
> Freek
More information about the nml-wg
mailing list