[Nml-wg] URN urn:ogf:network

[Jeroen van der Ham]

Freek Dijkstra wrote:
>>> So first things first:
>>> - Do we want to use URNs (e.g. urn:ogf:network or urn:ogf:nml) for
>>> identifiers of the classes we define?
>>> - If not, do we want to use URIs as identifier?
>>> - If not, are there other potential identifiers to use?
>>>
> So that is now 1.5 "vote" in favour of URN versus 2 "votes" in favour of 
> URL.

What is the status of this vote about class and property identifiers?

The resource identifiers is an interesting discussion, but we 
independent of the outcome of that discussion, we can take a decision on 
this issue.

Jeroen.