[Nml-wg] About modelisation of the network description

[Freek Dijkstra]

Evangelos Chaniotakis wrote:

>> Can we call them "Views" instead of "Models"? "Model" is a quite overloaded
>> word, especially in a semantic context.

Aurélien Cedeyn wrote:

> I tortured myself to find the good word to represent what i mean. First i used 
> the term of "View" but view implies that a description is already here.

I like "view". But perhaps simply "network" (not to be confused with 
administrative domain) or just "group" (or "group_of_network_elements").

Just as long as the relational properties are clear, I don't mind 
calling it "EckyEckyEckyEckyPikangZoomBoing".

Freek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nml-wg/attachments/20080304/ce8372cb/attachment.bin