[Nml-wg] Lifetime

Jeroen van der Ham vdham at uva.nl
Wed Mar 13 11:12:13 EDT 2013


Hi,


On 13 Mar 2013, at 11:07, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
> 
> Presence of start and/or end elements in Lifetime is not optional according to the XSD schema.
> 

This gives me the opportunity to also apply some new text that Richard suggested for the Syntaxes section:

>  These syntaxes follow the model as defined in section~\ref{s:schema}, should there be any inconsistencies between the syntaxes, the definitions in section~\ref{s:schema} take precedence over the syntaxes.

 ;-)

But more seriously, the schema document has an explicit MAY for the start and end time, so it should be optional.

Jeroen.



More information about the nml-wg mailing list