[Nml-wg] hasService / hasInboundPort

[Freek Dijkstra]

On 13-03-2013 10:37, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:

> On 13 Mar 2013, at 10:07, Freek Dijkstra <Freek.Dijkstra at surfsara.nl> wrote:

>> So I suggest we should make the second form a MUST, and the first a
>> SHOULD NOT. (Admittedly, the first form does no harm at all, and is
>> useful. The reason for the strong SHOULD NOT is that it brings a risk of
>> incompatibility if one organisation uses the first form, and another
>> organisation uses the second form)
> 
> That is already covered by the first MUST. The SHOULD NOT would mean that we change the inherited behaviour of the Switching Service. If we keep that as a SHOULD, and the hasInboundPort as MUST, things work out.

You're correct.

If you could make a suggest what text to add/change/remove, that would
be great!

Freek