[Nml-wg] layerencoding vs. encoding

[Roman Łapacz]

W dniu 2012-10-22 14:14, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
> Hi,
>
> According to https://forge.ogf.org/sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6577 it should be encoding?

It seems 'encoding' is valid now. I'll update the XSD schema.

I saw your updated topology file for the NSI demo 
(https://github.com/jeroenh/AutoGOLE-Topologies/blob/nsiv2/master.n3) 
and if you want to apply artf6577 the use of nmleth will have to be 
replaced with nml:label labeltype.

Roman

>
> Jeroen.
>
> On 19 Oct 2012, at 16:34, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeroen,
>>
>> I noticed that the UML diagram (and the OWL schema) has 'encoding' attribute in PortGroup (the same for LinkGroup but in this case the OWL schema does not have it) but I remember clearly that we replaced it with 'layerencoding' attribute (I included this in the XSD schema). To be honest now I don't know what is valid (at the beginning it was 'encoiding', than 'layerencoding' and now again 'encoding'?) .
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>> W dniu 2012-10-11 21:25, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> It is with great trepidation that I present to you a draft of the "Network Markup Language Base Schema version 1".
>>>
>>> Please have a look through it and let us/me know what you think about this document.
>>>
>>> With the feedback we get, we will improve the document and we plan to finally start the process on this document next month.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Jeroen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nml-wg mailing list
>>> nml-wg at ogf.org
>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg