[Nml-wg] References

[Jeroen van der Ham]

Hi,

On 27 Sep 2012, at 19:58, Aaron Brown <aaron at internet2.edu> wrote:
> In the latter case, however, how does someone who receives the topology supposed to know that this is the canonical definition of 'A', and they should not be looking for another definition of A elsewhere (e.g. should this be an error, or not per your discussion of in-document references vs. out-of-document references)?  

What if you receive two documents and both claim to have the canonical definition of 'A'?

Even if this would cause an error, how do you decide which is the right one?

Jeroen.