[Nml-wg] First draft of NML Schema document

[Roman Łapacz]

Just few comments/observations:

1) 1.1. "...Finally, you will not find a definition for the terms 
Network or capacity in this document"
  RL: ...but there is a definition (or piece of information) of Network 
object in 2.1.1. This might be misleading for a reader.

2) 2.1.1. "...The meaning of the version attribute is only defined for 
specific cases (in objects of the Topology class), and should not be 
used in other objects. Clients that receive a version attribute for a 
non-Topology object should ignore that attribute. "
   RL: So why not to move this attribute to the Topology class? If we 
want to keep it in the Network object for possible extension in the 
future then it should be indicated clearly in the text.

3) RL: Do we really need Service and Group elements? They don't have any 
attributes or relations. For example, Node, Port and Link don't have 
Element abstract class above. Inconsistency?

4) RL: Do we need the list of attributes in 2.1.2 inherited from Network 
abstract class (the same for other elements)? They are already described 
in 2.1.1.


Roman






W dniu 2012-10-11 21:25, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
> Hello all,
>
> It is with great trepidation that I present to you a draft of the "Network Markup Language Base Schema version 1".
>
> Please have a look through it and let us/me know what you think about this document.
>
> With the feedback we get, we will improve the document and we plan to finally start the process on this document next month.
>
>
> Thanks!
> Jeroen.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nml-wg mailing list
> nml-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nml-wg/attachments/20121120/bcd4c85d/attachment.html>