[Nml-wg] Example section (nml-base)

[Freek Dijkstra]

On 17-08-2012 16:49, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:

> I've tried to make a list of the implicit relations that I see, and I came to the following:
> 
> - hasTopology
> - hasNode
> - implementedBy
> - hasService
> - hasPort
> - hasLabel
> - hasLabelGroup
> - hasLink
> - locatedAt
> - existsDuring
> 
> Is that list complete?

In see https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6547: In the comment of August 8,
I marked all implicit relations with a "*".

There are two difference when comparing our two lists.


My list includes "providesPort" and "providesLink" (which are used in
Services).

Also, in your list the relation
<Node X>
   <Node Y>

could both mean
  Node X --hasNode--> Node Y
as well as
  Node X --implementedBy--> Node Y

For that reason, "implementedBy" should be an explicit relation.

Regards,
Freek