[Nml-wg] id/idref and inverse relations

[Freek Dijkstra]

Roman Łapacz wrote:

> I'm not sure that we really need to have the inverse relation in all
> cases.  I'm not against but maybe the types like
> "partofSerialCompoundLink" should be treated as extensions  (different
> namespace of attribute, eg. nml-ext:type). This way the core set of
> types would be minimal (its values would be the  most useful and popular).

Roman, you're a proponent of allowing inverse relations.

Could you give a use case why we need it in the first place?

Thanks,
Freek