[Nml-wg] XML syntax for NML relations

[Freek Dijkstra]

Freek Dijkstra wrote:

> All I was trying to suggest is that it occurs to me that d) would serve
> 3 out of the 3 requirements, and I was asking if someone on the list saw
> any serious problems with it. The only problems I have heard so far were
> that it (1) deviated from the solution in use for NMC, and (2) 

Sorry, the following line was missing in my previous email:
and (2) added one additional level of nesting to the XML messages.

Freek