[Nml-wg] Proposals in document

Jeroen van der Ham vdham at uva.nl
Wed Mar 3 07:35:48 CST 2010


On 22/02/2010 15:36, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Thank you once more for the proposal definitions on domain/topology and
> Could I ask for one more bit of your time? It would be beneficial for
> the discussions at OGF28 if these definitions are in the proposal by
> March 6th.
> 
> Especially the proposal on domain/topology is "good enough" to be
> solidified in our deliverable. I'm certain that more discussion will pop
> up by the time we are going to created classes and attributes of these
> terms.

Done.

Jeroen.


More information about the nml-wg mailing list