[Nmc-wg] Review of documents

[Freek Dijkstra]

Roman Lapacz wrote:

> For me relaxng is more readable than xsd.

Jason Zurawski wrote:

> We can add the XSD 
> representation to the Apendix and show both if there is interest, or we 
> can go with just one.  I would prefer to stick with RELAX since this 
> represents the physical work we did.

I agree with Roman, and propose not to include the XSD in the documents.


As long as no WSDL is used, there is no benefit in adding that.

Michael Bischoff also wrote:

> Now relaxng can be transformed but the transformation isn't
> formal/unambiguous/two-way, or differently put if you transform from
> relaxng to xsd and back you are not guaranteed to end up with the  
> same relaxng document.

I was not aware of this. I thought the RELAXNG -> XSD translation was
unambiguous.

In case someone later wants to add XSD, perhaps it is useful to note
this differences and perhaps even suggest how the translation should be
done.

Regards,
Freek