[Nmc-wg] Base doc

Roman Lapacz romradz at man.poznan.pl
Wed Jan 6 09:26:59 CST 2010


Hi,

some first comments/observations:

- I think the structure of namespace could be explained
- example of status response in 4.1 does not explain too much (looks the 
same as earlier response example)
- in 4.3.2.6 the concept of key could be explained more (for me the key 
represents some bigger information structure; reasons: performance, 
simplicity)
- in 4.3.2.7 the reference to "Characteristic" document is missing
- I'm wondering whether we can say in 4.3.3 that the request with more 
data triggers includes logical independent sub-requests
- 4.4.1: typo "request schema"
- I would remove parameter elements "supportedEventType" from all 
message examples. I understand that it's supported by the 
implementations but it's agreed to use eventType element
- I think we have to rebuild Result Code section and finish the 
discussion on new ideas proposed by Slawek and Jeff. That's very 
important and must be done.

Roman


More information about the Nmc-wg mailing list