[Nmc-wg] Base doc
Roman Lapacz
romradz at man.poznan.pl
Wed Jan 6 09:26:59 CST 2010
Hi,
some first comments/observations:
- I think the structure of namespace could be explained
- example of status response in 4.1 does not explain too much (looks the
same as earlier response example)
- in 4.3.2.6 the concept of key could be explained more (for me the key
represents some bigger information structure; reasons: performance,
simplicity)
- in 4.3.2.7 the reference to "Characteristic" document is missing
- I'm wondering whether we can say in 4.3.3 that the request with more
data triggers includes logical independent sub-requests
- 4.4.1: typo "request schema"
- I would remove parameter elements "supportedEventType" from all
message examples. I understand that it's supported by the
implementations but it's agreed to use eventType element
- I think we have to rebuild Result Code section and finish the
discussion on new ideas proposed by Slawek and Jeff. That's very
important and must be done.
Roman
More information about the Nmc-wg
mailing list