[Nmc-wg] (no subject)
Roman Lapacz
romradz at man.poznan.pl
Tue Apr 13 06:12:01 CDT 2010
Hi Jason & all,
I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure that
keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless after
chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they might be
used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples presenting
merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would remove them. What
do you think (see examples in the attachements)?
Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: merge-chaining-example1.xml
Type: application/xml
Size: 1440 bytes
Desc: before
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nmc-wg/attachments/20100413/b1069c2c/attachment.rdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: merge-chaining-example2.xml
Type: application/xml
Size: 1501 bytes
Desc: after
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nmc-wg/attachments/20100413/b1069c2c/attachment-0001.rdf
More information about the Nmc-wg
mailing list