[nm-wg] Next Phone Call

[Susan Evett]

Eric Boyd wrote:

> Next meeting is Tuesday, March 1 at 11 AM ET (the usual time).
>
> *Dial +1-734-531-0125 or +1-800-541-1710 and enter access code 0142286
>
> *Agenda TBD (basically recap from last meeting).
>
> --Eric
>
> Eric L. Boyd
> Manager, Performance Architecture & Technologies
> eboyd at internet2.edu
> 734-352-7032 (work)
> 734-834-6708 (cell)
>
> Internet2
> 1000 Oakbrook Drive, Suite 300
> Ann Arbor, MI 48104
>
ACTION ITEM:

   1. Mark to incorporate a parameter list - based on the group agreement.
   2. Mark to draft a strawman proposal regarding the second unresolved
      issue (packet types - required or optional?) and send it to the
      list for comment.
   3. Mark to note that all elements of TimeInformation are
      non-mandatory - based on the group agreement.
   4. Mark will include the option for specific parameters to be marked
      as 'required' or 'optional'.
   5. Richard will go to the standard body (i.e., NIST) to get an
      international 'standard' for Mbps, Mb/s, etc.
   6. Mark to take nm_params units for numPackets out of the document.
   7. Brian and Dan will provide Eric and Susan with information ;
      Internet2 will host the GGF NM-WG page. It will be redesigned and
      vetted by the group. Brian will continue to host the page until it
      is ready and then will create a redirect. Susan will ensure that
      WG chairs (Richard, Eric, and Mark) have editing authority to the
      page. (Page to be up before mid-March, next GGF).
   8. Group agreed that the final document will include all three
      elements listed above.
   9. Group agreed to expand the schema to define the event types by
      specifying what output would be produced (delay, rtt, raw ping
      output).
  10. Martin to send the output and code from the tools that were demoed
      to the list.
  11. Group agreed to reach consensus on delay.rtt, bw.achievable,
      delay.oneWay, and link.utilization via the list.
  12. Martin will send Richard/Mark information on the state-of-the-art
      at that point. Discussion to be held off-line.
  13. Richard (and co-chairs) will request the meeting at the GGF
      Chicago meeting (June).
  14. Implementers of the schema should report back to the mailing list
      on the reasons items were included/changed to document problems.

--Susan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nm-wg/attachments/20050228/9e993adf/attachment.htm