[jsdl-wg] JSDL 2.0 BOF?

[Andreas Savva]

Philipp & Andrew

I described the outcome of discussions from previous OGFs in my last
email. I see no reason to collect topics and prioritize. There is a work
list already. If you want to have a JSDL-WG session then it should be a
working session to work on already identified items. 

If you want to have an open-ended session then I think you really should
have a bof that is unaffiliated with JSDL-WG.
Andreas


On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:08:31 +0200, Philipp Wieder
<philipp.wieder at udo.edu>
wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> then I would suggest we get a slot, collect topics and prioritize them,
> and make an agenda for OGF 30. I assume we will have a substantial
> amount of people there and other may join remotely.
> 
> Best regards, Philipp.
> 
> Am 01.10.10 15:03, schrieb Andrew Grimshaw:
>> All,
>> I very much would like to get the JSDL 2.0 work going. I'm sure we can
>> get a
>> slot from Joel.
>> Speaking as the Architecture area director, JSDL 1.0 and its extensions
>> has
>> been very successful, but along the way several impediments to
continued
>> use
>> for production systems have been identified (see PGI discussions of
>> almost a
>> year ago.) JSDL is the glue (no pun intended) that holds job interop
>> together. So keeping it up-to-date with emerging or deferred
>> requirements is
>> essential. 
>> 
>> I know I would attend a session with a list of items from Mark Morgan
(as
>> long as it is not on Friday, when I will be on a plane.)
>> 
>> A
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jsdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:jsdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
Behalf
>> Of
>> Philipp Wieder
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 6:38 AM
>> To: Andre Merzky
>> Cc: OGF JSDL-WG ML
>> Subject: Re: [jsdl-wg] JSDL 2.0 BOF?
>> 
>> Count me in for work on JSDL. The question is whether we should (still
>> can) ask Joel for a slot.
>> 
>> Best regards, Philipp.
>> 
>> Am 30.09.10 18:43, schrieb Andre Merzky:
>>> Quoting [Andreas Savva] (Sep 30 2010):
>>>>
>>>> 2. Adoption of GLUE XML schema
>>>>    - Pending on a GLUE normative XML schema published by *OGF*. Work
>>>>    on
>>>> this seems to have restarted recently, but I am not sure what the
>>>> exact
>>>> state is.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, the GLUE WG plans to release a draft b y OGF-30.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I know people like to say 'JSDL 2.0' but, really, in the best
tradition
>> of  
>>>> divide-and-conquer there are a set of well-understood steps that can 

>>>> evolve things forward. As such I do not see the need for a BOF. I
think
>> it  
>>>> would actually be counterproductive because we'd go back to talking
>>>> about
>> 
>>>> what to do rather than doing it. The real question is whether there
>>>> are
>>>> people willing to work on these. A related question is whether they
>>>> would
>> 
>>>> be willing to work in JSDL-WG. At the last OGF it wasn't clear to me
>>>> that
>> 
>>>> this is the case.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andre.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>>   jsdl-wg mailing list
>>   jsdl-wg at ogf.org
>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsdl-wg
>> 
> --
>   jsdl-wg mailing list
>   jsdl-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsdl-wg

-- 
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.