[jsdl-wg] JSDL 2.0 BOF?

[alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de]

+1 from my side. Everything else is out of scope, isn't it...

-Alexander

Am 01.10.2010 um 12:37 schrieb Philipp Wieder:

> Count me in for work on JSDL. The question is whether we should (still
> can) ask Joel for a slot.
> 
> Best regards, Philipp.
> 
> Am 30.09.10 18:43, schrieb Andre Merzky:
>> Quoting [Andreas Savva] (Sep 30 2010):
>>> 
>>> 2. Adoption of GLUE XML schema
>>>   - Pending on a GLUE normative XML schema published by *OGF*. Work on  
>>> this seems to have restarted recently, but I am not sure what the exact  
>>> state is.
>> 
>> AFAIK, the GLUE WG plans to release a draft b y OGF-30.
>> 
>> 
>>> I know people like to say 'JSDL 2.0' but, really, in the best tradition of  
>>> divide-and-conquer there are a set of well-understood steps that can  
>>> evolve things forward. As such I do not see the need for a BOF. I think it  
>>> would actually be counterproductive because we'd go back to talking about  
>>> what to do rather than doing it. The real question is whether there are  
>>> people willing to work on these. A related question is whether they would  
>>> be willing to work in JSDL-WG. At the last OGF it wasn't clear to me that  
>>> this is the case.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Cheers, Andre.
>> 
>> 
> --
>  jsdl-wg mailing list
>  jsdl-wg at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsdl-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4678 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/jsdl-wg/attachments/20101001/90d597a4/attachment.bin