[jsdl-wg] my view on execution user and group

[Christopher Smith]

On 31/3/05 01:59, "Ali Anjomshoaa" <ali at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

>> I think that retaining the user name and group is useful, as I have customer
>> use cases where the template of a job is permanently attached to a
>> particular user identity for execution, so I think I'd like to see these
>> stay.
> 
> Will a POSIX user ID in the Application section satisfy your use-case? If
> not, can you please suggest a more concrete definition for a user element
> that would satisfy your use-case?
> 
That would definitely be good enough for me, as it is very much tied to the
notion of executing a process.

-- Chris