[karlcz at univa.com: Re: [jsdl-wg] Process Topology]

[Andreas Savva]

Afaik Resource should be 0-n.... If this has been changed to 0-1 then 
the meaning of what I understood CPUCount to be has probably also changed.

Could someone point to any minutes for this?

Andreas

Karl Czajkowski wrote:
> oops, hit reply instead of reply-all and missed the JSDL list...
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject:
> Re: [jsdl-wg] Process Topology
> From:
> Karl Czajkowski <karlcz at univa.com>
> Date:
> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:39:05 +0700
> To:
> Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> To:
> Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> 
> On Apr 20, Karl Czajkowski loaded a tape reading:
> ...
> 
>>If we were in fact going to allow multiple Resource elements (to
>>express heterogeneous resource mixes), ...
> 
> 
> 
> This is another inconsistency in the draft. 
> 
> Section 5.5.1.2 is entitled Multiplicity 0-1 in describing the Resource
> element.
> 
> Section 5.1.2.5 shows mulitplicit 0-n for Resource in the
> psuedo-schema.  I think this is the right thing to do, but I cannot
> remember if discussions resulted in us throwing out heterogeneous
> resource mixes from scope.
> 
> karl
> 

-- 
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd