[jsdl-wg] my view on execution user and group

[Michel Drescher]

Andreas and others,

On 4 Apr 2005, at 14:19, Andreas Savva wrote:
> I don't see this as a purity issue. We put out of scope security 
> saying that jsdl should be composed with some specialized language to 
> describe those requirements. This is not the same as saying that jsdl 
> should have no elements that might need such extra security 
> assertions.  So I can ask for machine with name X but whether I am 
> allowed to use it or not (and what I have to provide to be able to use 
> it) is a different issue and is out of scope. But asking for the 
> machine or resource by name is a resource request and is in scope.
>
> (And I do hope such in-scope / out-of-scope statements don't sound too 
> arbitrary. :-)

Hmm, somehow I thought I was stating the same. Anyway, the way you 
stated it makes it much more clearer.

Cheers,
Michel