[INFOD-WG] FW: OGC folks interested in INFOD?

[Fisher, SM (Steve)]

Reminder

-----Original Message-----
From: lee at aero.org [mailto:lee at aero.org] 
Sent: 22 July 2008 16:34
To: George Percivall; Fisher, SM (Steve)
Cc: craig at mhbackup.aero.org; Dieter Gawlick; Mallikarjun Shankar; David
Arctur
Subject: Re: OGC folks interested in INFOD?


Steve,

This just hit the street yesterday evening.  INFOD is called out by name
in Annex B, Section 3.8 "Non-OGC Standards Related to OWS-6"
OGF and many grid concepts are called out in Annex B, Section 4.2.

I've circulated the announcement from OGC late yesterday to the
the old GFSG list, the MSC, the AdCom, and the Board.  The challenge
now is to have an organized response from OGF, our member organizations,
and the wider grid community by September 5.

--Craig

At 7:12 AM -0400 7/22/08, George Percivall wrote:
>Steve,
>
>The OWS-6 RFQ/CFP is now posted.
>http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/50
>
>INFOD is listed as a reference in the Architecture Annex (Annex B) 
>of the RFQ/CFP.
>The SWE thread includes requirements for event architecture.
>The event architecture needs to apply to across all threads of OWS-6.
>
>Regards,
>George
>
>
>
>
>On Jul 22, 2008, at 6:29 AM, Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
>
>>Craig, George
>>
>>Yes we would be very pleased to discuss the applicability of INFOD
with
>>you. Where can we see the  OWS-6 RFQ/CFP you refer to? I have copied
>>Arjun in as you have already met him.
>>
>>Steve
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lee at aero.org [mailto:lee at aero.org]
>>>Sent: 12 July 2008 18:55
>>>To: George Percivall
>>>Cc: craig at mhbackup.aero.org; Fisher, SM (Steve); Dieter Gawlick
>>>Subject: Re: OGC folks interested in INFOD?
>>>
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>>>Steve Fisher and Dieter Gawlick surely know Mallikarjun.
>>>They were asking
>>>about other OGC folks who might be interested in INFOD.  I'm
>>>sure they'd be
>>>happy to start a conversation and determine any
>>>applicability.  This would
>>>certainly be timely if there is any motivation to response to
>>>the OWS-6 RFQ/CFP
>>>wrt INFOD!
>>>
>>>--Craig
>>>
>>>
>>>At 3:34 PM -0400 7/11/08, George Percivall wrote:
>>>>Craig,
>>>>
>>>>Mallikarjun Shankar, Oak Ridge National Laboratory is an editor of
>>>>INFOD.    shankarm at ornl.gov
>>>>
>>>>Shankar and I have met before regarding Sensor activities in OGC.
>>>>Shankar and I spoke at OGF-20 about INFOD where he showed me an
>>>>application of INFOD to sensor networks.  Unfortunately his
>>>>presentation said nothing about the OGC SWE standards.
>>>>
>>>>INFOD might meet some of the OGC needs for event based patterns that
>>>>will be addressed in the OWS-6 testbed, e.g., pub-sub, WNS, SAS.
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps Shankar and ORNL will respond to the OWS-6 RFQ/CFP proposing
>>>>to apply the INFOD specification to the OGC requirements?
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:08 PM, lee at aero.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>George,
>>>>>
>>>>>Are there specific OGC folks who might be interested in INFOD?
>>>>>If so, I can put them in touch w/ one of the INFOD authors for
>>>>>technical discussions at whatever depth.
>>>>>
>>>>>--Craig
>>>>
>>>>George Percivall
>>>>Open Geospatial Consortium
>>>>http://www.opengeospatial.org/
>>>>E-mail: percivall at opengeospatial.org
>>>>Voice: +1-301-560-6439
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>*************************************************************
>>>***************
>>>>This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use
>>>>of addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
>>>>copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly
>>>>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
>>>>sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and
>>>>destroy all copies.
>>>>*************************************************************
>>>***************
>>>
>>
>
>George Percivall
>Open Geospatial Consortium
>http://www.opengeospatial.org/
>E-mail: percivall at opengeospatial.org
>Voice: +1-301-560-6439
>
>
>
>***********************************************************************
*****
>This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use 
>of addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
>copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly 
>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the 
>sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and 
>destroy all copies.
>***********************************************************************
*****