[INFOD-WG] Status of spec

[Fisher, SM (Steve)]

Ronny,

 
That is excellent - unfortunately Vijay does not think the WSDL for the
notification messages should exist.

I don't follow his reasoning however

Steve


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronny Fehling [mailto:ronny.fehling at oracle.com] 
> Sent: 06 May 2007 16:29
> To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
> Cc: infod-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [INFOD-WG] Status of spec
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Regarding your point about 1761-1763: The choice element says 
> that either a ConsumerEntryReference or 
> DynamicConsumerConstraint ELEMENT has to exist. That we 
> mandate. However, the list of entries in there can be empty 
> (type any). So everything should be correct.
> 
> I have added the wsdl for publisher/consumer/subscriberNotification.
> I also corrected the Notify wsdl - it contained errors.
> I also corrected the GetMetaData wsdl - it was missing the 
> response and fault messages.
> 
> I think we're ok now.
> 
> Ronny
> 
> Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote: 
> 
> 	Hi,
> 	
> 	We have had a few list minute problems. Currently I 
> have a small query
> 	about 5.11 (see below) and Ronny has noticed that the 
> WSDL for the
> 	notifications has been overlooked. I don't want to 
> release the document
> 	while it has such an omission. Is Vijay around to fix 
> this quickly - if
> 	not does anybody feel compeent to provide the missing WSDL. 
> 	
> 	Note that I have to provide a report for the data area 
> meeting on Monday
> 	at 16:00 (UTC+1) and I would much prefer to say that we 
> have resubmitted
> 	the document rather than saying that we are about to do 
> so! Can we make
> 	it?
> 	
> 	Steve
> 	
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Fisher, SM (Steve) 
> 	Sent: 06 May 2007 15:21
> 	To: 'Ronny Fehling'; Vijay Dialani
> 	Cc: shankarm at ornl.gov
> 	Subject: RE: Version 12 checked in
> 	
> 	Ronny,
> 	
> 	I still don't understand 5.11. You have a "choice" 
> element to ensure
> 	that there is at least one 
> 	ConsumerEntryReference or DynamicConsumerConstraint. 
> However when the
> 	registry wants the publisher to stop publishing then it it is
> 	permissible for these both to be empty - see lines 
> 1761-1763. Otherwise
> 	I happy with your changes.
> 	
> 	Vijay,
> 	
> 	Are you going to be able to provide the missing WSDL very soon?
> 	
> 	Steve
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	  
> 
> 		-----Original Message-----
> 		From: Ronny Fehling [mailto:ronny.fehling at oracle.com] 
> 		Sent: 06 May 2007 05:07
> 		To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
> 		Cc: shankarm at ornl.gov; Vijay Dialani
> 		Subject: Re: Version 12 checked in
> 		
> 		did the changes.
> 		found several additional errors in the xml...
> 		also, i saw that the wsdl for  pub, sub, 
> consumer notify is 
> 		missing. - 
> 		vijay?
> 		
> 		r
> 		
> 		Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
> 		    
> 
> 			Hi,
> 			
> 			I found when reading through sections 
> 3.2.1 to 3.2.3 that 
> 			      
> 
> 		we were using
> 		    
> 
> 			the name PublisherReference and 
> ConsumerReference when it 
> 			      
> 
> 		should have
> 		    
> 
> 			been PublisherEntryReference and 
> ConsumerEntryReference. I have
> 			corrected this in section 3
> 			
> 			I presume that for the notification 
> from publisher to 
> 			      
> 
> 		consumer however
> 		    
> 
> 			that this really is the 
> PublisherReference - or is it?
> 			
> 			Having added these I may have made 
> sections 5.11 to 5.13 
> 			      
> 
> 		inconsistent.
> 		    
> 
> 			However 5.11 looks very wrong as it has 
> 2 sections called
> 			StaticConsumerReference.
> 			
> 			Can one of you who is better at XML 
> than I, check that 5.11 
> 			      
> 
> 		to 5.13 in
> 		    
> 
> 			consistent with chapter 3 please
> 			
> 			Steve
> 			  
> 			      
> 
> 	--
> 	  infod-wg mailing list
> 	  infod-wg at ogf.org
> 	  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/infod-wg
> 	  
> 
>