[infod-wg] Property vocabularies: Naming and references

[Dieter Gawlick]

Stephen,

I finally got your e-mail. Here is my very short reply.

We could start on Tuesday with a setting the agenda. I think, however, 
there is only one critical task - the review of the two documents.

While we do this we will come up with a list of the issues - including 
those you mentioned. I hope, we will be able to make decisions in almost 
all cases right away.

Dieter


Stephen Davey wrote:
>
> Hi Dieter,
>
> Your point about how do you reference instances of property 
> vocabularies is very similar to what I found with my use case when I 
> wanted to refer to Property Vocabularies. I guess this is something 
> that can be discussed at the F2F next week. I also thought of a few 
> other issues that could perhaps be discussed at the F2F:
>
>  
>
>    1. Do we need to mention Lifetime Management for INFOD entities and
>       vocabs? E.g. WS-Lifetime.
>    2. Is there a default vocabulary for INFOD entities themselves?
>       E.g. If you wanted to query all the entities that were of type
>       "Subscription" or "Publisher" say.
>    3. The plan for the Consume message format is to use the WS-Notify
>       format I believe? But in WSN it uses Topics so will these be
>       related to the INFOD vocabs somehow?
>
>  
>
> Do we have a draft agenda for the F2F or will that be the first task 
> on the Tuesday?
>
>  
>
> Cheers, Stephen.
>
>  
>
> --------------------------
>
> Stephen Davey,
>
> National e-Science Centre,
>
> Edinburgh, UK.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-infod-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-infod-wg at ggf.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Dieter Gawlick
> *Sent:* 08 May 2006 20:04
> *To:* infod-wg at ggf.org
> *Subject:* [infod-wg] Property vocabularies: Naming and references
>
>  
>
> While working on GetMetaData, I came across the following issues:
>
>     * We need a naming convention for vocabularies - the vocabularies
>       and fields within vocabularies? We should reserve certain names
>       for INFOD; e.g.; everything starting with wsinfod is reserved,
>       software vendors can use any name, which starts with/includes $
>       vendor name/$vendor stock symbol - tor extensibility; everything
>       else is open. This mimics the JMS model. Is there a convention
>       in OGSA - this is a question especially to Susan?
>     * We should be able to reference (instances of) property
>       vocabularies (0 to n). Here is an example: let us assume there
>       is a vocabulary for individual car dealers and one for car
>       dealers in each state or region. Obviously, one would like to
>       reference the region vocabulary from the individual dealer.
>       While we could leave this as an exercise of the user, I would
>       prefer to add the reference.
>
> Dieter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/infod-wg/attachments/20060512/7b004bc0/attachment.html