[infod-wg] SOAP dependency

[Stephen Davey]

Hi Steve,
You are right I think that our text should not say "... using the SOAP
v1.1. Base Fault Spec", but should perhaps say "... using
WS-BaseFaults".

And then as you say, our spec should clearly mark any SOAP stuff as
"SOAP Examples".

Cheers, Stephen.

--------------------------
Stephen Davey, 
National e-Science Centre,
Edinburgh, UK.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-infod-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-infod-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of Fisher, SM (Steve)
Sent: 28 April 2006 13:31
To: infod-wg at ggf.org
Subject: [infod-wg] SOAP dependency

We say in a number of cases:

The message will be sent using the SOAP   v 1.1. Base Fault Spec: 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/wsrf-ws_base_faults-1.2-spec-pr-01.pdf


However the document mentioned above explains the BaseFault and then
shows *as examples* SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 encodings. We must not tie our spec
to SOAP!

Do people agree?

Steve